https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26685
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #15) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14) > > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #13) > > > What is needed is some sort of flag to indicate that in this specific case > > > it needs to be foo(%eip). > > > > No, we don't want 0x67 prefix for RIP-relative addressing for x32. > > You did read me writing "in this specific case", didn't you? I understand > you don't want this in the general case. The way your (broken) change was > written, you very much get a 0x67 prefix in this specific case, so I don't > understand at all what you're trying to tell me. GNU assembler serves GCC. GCC doesn't use (%eip) and GCC always uses (%rip) for RIP-relative addressing. Assembler should extract the address size prefix from the register operand here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
