Le 20 févr. 06 à 20:08, Hans Aberg a écrit :
(I don't remember why it's like this,
Because it has always been so, and you, according to you earlier
comment about "an effort is made sure it compiles under C++", which
I gather can only refer to your own checks, is giving support to
it. Paul Eggert later extended this original static C-parserstack
to becoming dynamic. Apparently is is used alos as C++ code
automatically when invoking %union.
It has always been dynamic. Hans, I would appreciate if you
could stop given your view of the history of bison, as it's
way too often wrong.
