On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Hans Aberg wrote: > On 21 Feb 2006, at 19:34, Joel E. Denny wrote: > > > If this usage is fine, then I wonder how "lalr1.cc" supports non-POD types > > more than "yacc.c". A footnote in the same section says that > > `pseudo-unions' may alleviate this need for pointers in the future.
[snip] > Then the semantic type is a non-POD class OK, so you #define YYSTYPE, I take it. It seems that this usage is addressed in "lalr1.cc", which I should have checked before. Akim, should a sentence about this usage be added to section `10.1.2 C++ Semantic Values'? Joel
