>>>>> plundis writes: p> OKUJI Yoshinori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Does that sound good? >> No. His opinion is to add the feature into the Multiboot >> Specification but not only into GRUB's own implementation. p> Well, we need it in the Multiboot standard anyway if we want to be p> portable to other architectures. I think this is true, but I don't have any real evidence to the truth of the matter. Can somebody provide details of how non-PC architectures do video modes? I know that Okuji believes GRUB will not be ported to other architectures (without a total rewrite), but the Multiboot standard itself is a different issue. -- Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/) Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
- Re: Graphics mode support Olivier Galibert
- Re: Graphics mode support OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Graphics mode support plundis
- Re: Graphics mode support plundis
- Re: Graphics mode support OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Graphics mode support plundis
- Re: Graphics mode support OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Graphics mode support Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: Graphics mode support OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Graphics mode support plundis
- Re: Graphics mode support Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: Graphics mode support plundis
- Re: Graphics mode support OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Graphics mode support Per Lundberg
- Re: Graphics mode support plundis
- Re: Graphics mode support Stephen Early
- Re: Graphics mode support OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Graphics mode support Stephen Early
- Re: Graphics mode support OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Graphics mode support Per Lundberg
- Re: Graphics mode support OKUJI Yoshinori
