>>>>> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marius> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the >> end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there >> any reason why we shouldn't fix it in the same way on the stable >> branch? Marius> This change would be too far reaching for a supposedly Marius> stable program. Debugging wouldn't be turned on when Marius> people expect it. I'm not convinced. How can people be expecting debugging to be turned on after having explicitly said `(debug-disable 'debug)' in their .guile file? Also note that the fix only affects REPL usage, not programs run using `guile -s'. If you are concerned about `trace' not working, we could add `(debug-disable 'debug)' into the definition of `trace'. I'd say it's a bug, and that it would be better to squash it now than to support strange expectations through 1.6.x. Neil _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile