8dd35a0e2 is good
2017-12-02 21:12 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com>: > It seems, that we have a breakage in current core-updates. m4, gettext, > and at least a few other packages fail to build. > > We had a discussion about that on irc, here are the important points: > > [09:34:53] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567250> * g_bor > has joined #guix > [09:34:58] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567251> <g_bor> Hello > guix! > [09:37:37] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567253> <g_bor> I > just tried to build something no core-updates and m4 and python-boot0 does > not build, I get a message that a decoding error occured in exception > dispatcher. It seem like it's locale related, I'm on hu_HU.UTF-8 > [09:38:03] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567254> <g_bor> I'm > tring this now on master to see if the problem persists. > [09:38:10] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567255> <g_bor> > Anyone > seen that? > [16:46:05] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567672> <civodul> > mb[m]1: > you were right about the failing installation tests > [16:46:16] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567673> <civodul> it > did work a couple of days ago though, so there's hope > [16:47:16] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567675> <mb[m]1> > civodul: > Any idea what caused it? Haven't been paying attention lately. > [16:47:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567676> * > kristofer has joined #guix > [16:53:03] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567677> <civodul> > mb[m]1: > no idea yet, let's see > [16:54:11] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567678> <mb[m]1> I > don't understand why core-updates is failing. I've bisected glibc down to > the first two commits on the 2.26 branch, and also tried reverting the > libatomic-ops update. > [16:54:35] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567679> <civodul> > how's > it failing? > [16:54:41] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567680> <civodul> > well > maybe i should focus on one thing at a time :-) > [16:54:46] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567681> <mb[m]1> So > the culprit is likely one of these: https://sourceware.org/ > git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=665ce88d68fd13c5c... > <https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=665ce88d68fd13c5c4cbaf2808434c618745137c> > and https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h= > dc258ce62ae0bbb45... > <https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc258ce62ae0bbb456c6a855dbb6b384ecf7e988> > [16:55:27] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567682> * > jonsger has joined #guix > [16:55:31] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567683> <mb[m]1> > civodul: > "m4" and a few others fail like this: https://paste.debian.net/998765/ > [16:55:36] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567684> <civodul> > you'll > find yourself being a libc hacker without noticing > [16:55:41] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567685> <mb[m]1> > Hehe. > [16:56:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567686> <civodul> in > this case it's the 'configure' file that leads to a decoding error > [16:56:28] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567687> <civodul> > could > you check its encoding? > > [16:57:52] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567689> <mb[m]1> I > don't currently have the files. But I had built much further before the > glibc update (with the C++ fixes only). > [16:57:56] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567690> * > jonsger has joined #guix > [17:00:55] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567693> <mb[m]1> I > unpacked the m4 source and ran `file` on it: > [17:00:57] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567694> <mb[m]1> > configure: > POSIX shell script, UTF-8 Unicode text executable > [17:01:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567695> <civodul> so > it could be an issue with iconv in the new libc > [17:06:59] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567697> * > ryanwatkins has joined #guix > [17:11:08] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567699> <g_bor> > hello! > [17:11:18] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567700> <g_bor> > Anyone > seen this? > [17:11:30] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567701> <g_bor> It's > on core-updates: > [17:11:51] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567702> <g_bor> > starting > phase `patch-usr-bin-file' Backtrace: 16 (primitive-load > "/gnu/store/4jf0jcpvjn6r2warav5xmxhmddf?") > In ice-9/eval.scm: 191:35 15 (_ _) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 863:16 14 (every1 > #<procedure 9b0b40 at /gnu/store/yifqwmdxc4pmd?> ?) In /gnu/store/ > yifqwmdxc4pmdpm73diq03lqkprnrizn-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm: > 711:27 13 (_ _) 171:4 12 (patch-usr-bin-file #:native-inputs _ #:inputs _ # > _) In srfi/srfi > [17:13:38] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567703> <civodul> > g_bor: > mb[m]1 was just reporting the exact same issue :-) > [17:13:45] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567704> <mb[m]1> > g_bor: > Yes, I'm currently trying to track it down. > [17:14:36] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567705> <g_bor> I've > also seen it on python-boot0, slightly different message. > [17:14:55] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567706> <g_bor> Can > this be locale related? > [17:15:05] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567707> <g_bor> I > have hu_HU.utf8 here. > [17:16:04] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567708> * > civodul has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer) > [17:17:26] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567709> <g_bor> > mb[m]1: > can I be of assistance? > [17:18:19] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567711> * > civodul has joined #guix > [17:18:42] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567713> <mb[m]1> > g_bor: > The failure happens in the build container which uses a fixed locale (C?). > [17:19:17] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567714> <g_bor> Ok, > then it's not that. > [17:19:38] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567715> <g_bor> It > just seemd to be some character conversion error... > [17:20:08] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567716> <g_bor> Maybe > some invalid charaters leaked in somehow... > [17:20:15] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567717> <g_bor> Wait > a sec... > [17:22:51] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567719> <g_bor> It > seems, that a lot of packages are broken. > [17:23:01] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567720> <g_bor> I > laso got that for gettext. > [17:26:26] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567721> * > xkapastel has joined #guix > [17:30:38] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567723> <mb[m]1> Can > it be ncurses related? > [17:31:12] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567724> <g_bor> Might > be... > [17:31:21] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567725> <g_bor> did > not checked that. > [17:32:01] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567726> <mb[m]1> > g_bor: > Can you see if reverting 667082d59104d4b964dce878f5e8c0f8ad1be958 makes a > difference? > [17:32:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567727> <g_bor> Ok, > i will try that > [17:36:36] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567731> <g_bor> Do > we know about what was the last time it was working? > [17:36:58] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567732> <g_bor> We > could do a git bisect on core-updates? > [17:37:13] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567733> <g_bor> Do > we have a good commit to start from? > [18:40] <g_bor> Ok, now it's building. > [18:40] <g_bor> I think this will take a time... > [18:41] <g_bor> (guile does take some time :) ) > [18:42] <g_bor> I'm trying to help to switch the default icedtea to > icedtea-8, and we'd like to that on core-updates... > [18:43] <g_bor> I've just written on the mailing list, that it would be > nice if we could have substitutes for the core-updates gnu-build-system. > [18:43] <g_bor> That could speed things like this up. > [18:50] <efraim> mb[m]1: just popped in for a second, core-updates is > failing on aarch64 also > [18:50] <efraim> civodul too ^ > [18:52] <g_bor> Oh, well. > [18:52] <g_bor> Do we have a bug report on that already? > [18:53] <g_bor> Now I'm trying what mb[m]1 suggested, by reverting the > ncurses commit. > [18:54] <g_bor> It might be easier to track related information in a > bug... > > [20:52] <g_bor> reverting 667082d59104d4b964dce878f5e8c0f8ad1be958 did > not help > > Does anyone know of a last working commit id? > > I'm trying to seen if it's working after last merge of master, but if > someone knows a later point to start investigating the issue would help. > > It would also help, if someone with a more powerful computer could help, > as building on mine is very slow. > >
