Reverting ee3ebf1a357bd4eb36a2fa1790a7b549cffb305a works. I'm sure it is
not optimal, but for now I will go with it.


2017-12-03 9:45 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com>:

> ee3ebf1a357bd4eb36a2fa1790a7b549cffb305a is the first bad commit.
>
> 2017-12-03 9:41 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com>:
>
>>  8dd35a0e2 is good
>>
>>
>> 2017-12-02 21:12 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits <boskov...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> It seems, that we have a breakage in current core-updates. m4, gettext,
>>> and at least a few other packages fail to build.
>>>
>>> We had a discussion about that on irc, here are the important points:
>>>
>>> [09:34:53] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567250> *
>>> g_bor has joined #guix
>>> [09:34:58] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567251> <g_bor> 
>>> Hello
>>> guix!
>>> [09:37:37] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567253> <g_bor> I
>>> just tried to build something no core-updates and m4 and python-boot0 does
>>> not build, I get a message that a decoding error occured in exception
>>> dispatcher. It seem like it's locale related, I'm on hu_HU.UTF-8
>>> [09:38:03] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567254> <g_bor> I'm
>>> tring this now on master to see if the problem persists.
>>> [09:38:10] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567255> <g_bor> 
>>> Anyone
>>> seen that?
>>> [16:46:05] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567672>
>>> <civodul> mb[m]1: you were right about the failing installation tests
>>> [16:46:16] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567673>
>>> <civodul> it did work a couple of days ago though, so there's hope
>>> [16:47:16] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567675>
>>> <mb[m]1> civodul: Any idea what caused it? Haven't been paying
>>> attention lately.
>>> [16:47:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567676> *
>>> kristofer has joined #guix
>>> [16:53:03] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567677>
>>> <civodul> mb[m]1: no idea yet, let's see
>>> [16:54:11] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567678>
>>> <mb[m]1> I don't understand why core-updates is failing. I've bisected
>>> glibc down to the first two commits on the 2.26 branch, and also tried
>>> reverting the libatomic-ops update.
>>> [16:54:35] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567679>
>>> <civodul> how's it failing?
>>> [16:54:41] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567680>
>>> <civodul> well maybe i should focus on one thing at a time :-)
>>> [16:54:46] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567681>
>>> <mb[m]1> So the culprit is likely one of these: https://sourceware.org/
>>> git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=665ce88d68fd13c5c...
>>> <https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=665ce88d68fd13c5c4cbaf2808434c618745137c>
>>>  and https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc258ce6
>>> 2ae0bbb45...
>>> <https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=dc258ce62ae0bbb456c6a855dbb6b384ecf7e988>
>>> [16:55:27] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567682> *
>>> jonsger has joined #guix
>>> [16:55:31] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567683>
>>> <mb[m]1> civodul: "m4" and a few others fail like this:
>>> https://paste.debian.net/998765/
>>> [16:55:36] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567684>
>>> <civodul> you'll find yourself being a libc hacker without noticing
>>> [16:55:41] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567685>
>>> <mb[m]1> Hehe.
>>> [16:56:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567686>
>>> <civodul> in this case it's the 'configure' file that leads to a
>>> decoding error
>>> [16:56:28] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567687>
>>> <civodul> could you check its encoding?
>>>
>>> [16:57:52] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567689>
>>> <mb[m]1> I don't currently have the files. But I had built much further
>>> before the glibc update (with the C++ fixes only).
>>> [16:57:56] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567690> *
>>> jonsger has joined #guix
>>> [17:00:55] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567693>
>>> <mb[m]1> I unpacked the m4 source and ran `file` on it:
>>> [17:00:57] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567694>
>>> <mb[m]1> configure: POSIX shell script, UTF-8 Unicode text executable
>>> [17:01:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567695>
>>> <civodul> so it could be an issue with iconv in the new libc
>>> [17:06:59] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567697> *
>>> ryanwatkins has joined #guix
>>> [17:11:08] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567699> <g_bor>
>>> hello!
>>> [17:11:18] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567700> <g_bor> 
>>> Anyone
>>> seen this?
>>> [17:11:30] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567701> <g_bor> 
>>> It's
>>> on core-updates:
>>> [17:11:51] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567702> <g_bor> 
>>> starting
>>> phase `patch-usr-bin-file' Backtrace: 16 (primitive-load
>>> "/gnu/store/4jf0jcpvjn6r2warav5xmxhmddf?") In ice-9/eval.scm: 191:35 15
>>> (_ _) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 863:16 14 (every1 #<procedure 9b0b40 at
>>> /gnu/store/yifqwmdxc4pmd?> ?) In /gnu/store/yifqwmdxc4pmdpm73di
>>> q03lqkprnrizn-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm: 711:27 13
>>> (_ _) 171:4 12 (patch-usr-bin-file #:native-inputs _ #:inputs _ # _) In
>>> srfi/srfi
>>> [17:13:38] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567703>
>>> <civodul> g_bor: mb[m]1 was just reporting the exact same issue :-)
>>> [17:13:45] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567704>
>>> <mb[m]1> g_bor: Yes, I'm currently trying to track it down.
>>> [17:14:36] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567705> <g_bor> 
>>> I've
>>> also seen it on python-boot0, slightly different message.
>>> [17:14:55] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567706> <g_bor> Can
>>> this be locale related?
>>> [17:15:05] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567707> <g_bor> I
>>> have hu_HU.utf8 here.
>>> [17:16:04] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567708> *
>>> civodul has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
>>> [17:17:26] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567709> <g_bor> 
>>> mb[m]1:
>>> can I be of assistance?
>>> [17:18:19] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567711> *
>>> civodul has joined #guix
>>> [17:18:42] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567713>
>>> <mb[m]1> g_bor: The failure happens in the build container which uses a
>>> fixed locale (C?).
>>> [17:19:17] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567714> <g_bor> Ok,
>>> then it's not that.
>>> [17:19:38] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567715> <g_bor> It
>>> just seemd to be some character conversion error...
>>> [17:20:08] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567716> <g_bor> 
>>> Maybe
>>> some invalid charaters leaked in somehow...
>>> [17:20:15] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567717> <g_bor> 
>>> Wait
>>> a sec...
>>> [17:22:51] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567719> <g_bor> It
>>> seems, that a lot of packages are broken.
>>> [17:23:01] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567720> <g_bor> I
>>> laso got that for gettext.
>>> [17:26:26] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567721> *
>>> xkapastel has joined #guix
>>> [17:30:38] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567723>
>>> <mb[m]1> Can it be ncurses related?
>>> [17:31:12] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567724> <g_bor> 
>>> Might
>>> be...
>>> [17:31:21] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567725> <g_bor> did
>>> not checked that.
>>> [17:32:01] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567726>
>>> <mb[m]1> g_bor: Can you see if reverting 
>>> 667082d59104d4b964dce878f5e8c0f8ad1be958
>>> makes a difference?
>>> [17:32:24] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567727> <g_bor> Ok,
>>> i will try that
>>> [17:36:36] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567731> <g_bor> Do
>>> we know about what was the last time it was working?
>>> [17:36:58] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567732> <g_bor> We
>>> could do a git bisect on core-updates?
>>> [17:37:13] <https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-12-02#T1567733> <g_bor> Do
>>> we have a good commit to start from?
>>> [18:40] <g_bor> Ok, now it's building.
>>> [18:40] <g_bor> I think this will take a time...
>>> [18:41] <g_bor> (guile does take some time :) )
>>> [18:42] <g_bor> I'm trying to help to switch the default icedtea to
>>> icedtea-8, and we'd like to that on core-updates...
>>> [18:43] <g_bor> I've just written on the mailing list, that it would be
>>> nice if we could have substitutes for the core-updates gnu-build-system.
>>> [18:43] <g_bor> That could speed things like this up.
>>> [18:50] <efraim> mb[m]1: just popped in for a second, core-updates is
>>> failing on aarch64 also
>>> [18:50] <efraim> civodul too ^
>>> [18:52] <g_bor> Oh, well.
>>> [18:52] <g_bor> Do we have a bug report on that already?
>>> [18:53] <g_bor> Now I'm trying what mb[m]1 suggested, by reverting the
>>> ncurses commit.
>>> [18:54] <g_bor> It might be easier to track related information in a
>>> bug...
>>>
>>> [20:52] <g_bor> reverting 667082d59104d4b964dce878f5e8c0f8ad1be958 did
>>> not help
>>>
>>> Does anyone know of a last working commit id?
>>>
>>> I'm trying to seen if it's working after last merge of master, but if
>>> someone knows a later point to start investigating the issue would help.
>>>
>>> It would also help, if someone with a more powerful computer could help,
>>> as building on mine is very slow.
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to