Hi! Justus, believe me, I do understand your frustration. Thank you very much for being insistent, instead of just going away.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:03:43 +0100, Justus Winter <4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: > Either more people have to review the patches, or we need to > change the commit policy. I agree. > Also, let's just merge the startup patch series. The hairy part of it > has been tested in Debian Hurd for a year now. We agree on the > principle, and noone took the time or cared enough to disagree with > the patch series. A reasonable assertion. > The glibc change is trivial. And even if the change is not applied to > the glibc, it only breaks the system shutdown. Furthermore, I believe > that we, the Hurd developers, should be entitled to make such a change > without the explicit consent of the glibc developers. If this is not > the case, then I do not believe that developing the Hurd is very > practical, or even possible, given that half of the Hurd system is > implemented in the glibc. Yes. I have already started discussing some procedural changes, and will follow up once I'm back home (currently travelling), in early December. Grüße, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
