Guillem Jover <[email protected]> writes: > Hi! > > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 12:43:22 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> writes: >> > --- a/ftp/extern.h >> > +++ b/ftp/extern.h >> > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ void reset (int, char **); >> > void restart (int, char **); >> > void rmthelp (int, char **); >> > void rmtstatus (int, char **); >> >> Any reason K&R prototypes are used here? Should we change this? > > Maybe I'm missing something, but how are those K&R prototypes? K&R style > lack function arguments, these only lack argument names which is fine.
Duh, sorry. So these are valid C89 and/or C99 prototypes? That would explain why I didn't find a gcc parameter to catch them... /Simon
