>> > --- a/ftp/extern.h
>> > +++ b/ftp/extern.h
>> > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ void reset (int, char **);
>> > void restart (int, char **);
>> > void rmthelp (int, char **);
>> > void rmtstatus (int, char **);
>>
>> Any reason K&R prototypes are used here? Should we change this?
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but how are those K&R prototypes?
> K&R style lack function arguments, these only lack argument names
> which is fine.
Duh, sorry. So these are valid C89 and/or C99 prototypes? That
would explain why I didn't find a gcc parameter to catch them...
Back in the day you'd skip the name of a variable in the prototype,
hence it being called K&Rism. It is valid C though, be it C90 or C99;
much like it is still valid to write:
int foo (int, char)
int a, char b;
{
...
}
