Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]

[Gary V. Vaughan]

On 6 Mar 2008, at 20:04, Peter O'Gorman wrote:

Peter O'Gorman wrote:

Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:

libtool: link: f90 -shared -Qoption ld --whole-archive ./.libs/ liba1.a ./.libs/liba2.a -Qoption ld --no-whole-archive - Qoption ld -soname -Qoption ld liba12.so.0 -o .libs/liba12.so.0.0.0

/convenience.at:211: exit code was 1, expected 0

18. convenience.at:169: 18. FC convenience archives (convenience.at:169): FAILED (convenience.at:211)

into this.

Libtool detected FC as f90, but otherwise used the gcc tools. I'll look

Because we generally use the same archive_cmds for F77, FC as for CXX,
things can get a little messed up. This "fixes" the most common case,

"other fortran compiler" does not exist.

Thoughts?

gcc, g++, g77/gfortran & some other fortran compiler, by pretending the

Maybe we should look into tagging the archive_cmds instead.

Cheers,
        Gary
--
  <=====.                   Email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 / @ @  /|           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
 \      \\      ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
  \^^^^^^\\

What happens to a project written with gnu C and vendor fortran? Will this test spot g++ and refuse to build the fortran files?

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Bug-libtool mailing list
Bug-libtool@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool