Hello Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 02:04:41AM CET: > Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: > > > >>> libtool: link: f90 -shared -Qoption ld --whole-archive ./.libs/liba1.a > >>> ./.libs/liba2.a -Qoption ld --no-whole-archive -Qoption ld -soname > >>> -Qoption ld liba12.so.0 -o .libs/liba12.so.0.0.0 > >>> /convenience.at:211: exit code was 1, expected 0 > >>> 18. convenience.at:169: 18. FC convenience archives (convenience.at:169): > >>> FAILED (convenience.at:211) > > > > Libtool detected FC as f90, but otherwise used the gcc tools. I'll look > > into this. > > Because we generally use the same archive_cmds for F77, FC as for CXX,
No we don't. archive_cmds _is_ tagged. In a casual test, it worked just fine for me to mix gcc and g++ with Solaris 10 f77 and f90. I must admit that I don't yet know why this doesn't work for Nelson's system, though. > things can get a little messed up. This "fixes" the most common case, > gcc, g++, g77/gfortran & some other fortran compiler, by pretending the > "other fortran compiler" does not exist. As I said before, I know several setups where this kind of thing does work (as long as your patch is not applied). Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
