* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 06:42:13AM CET: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > On 6 Mar 2008, at 20:04, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > >> > >> Because we generally use the same archive_cmds for F77, FC as for CXX, > >> things can get a little messed up. This "fixes" the most common case, > >> gcc, g++, g77/gfortran & some other fortran compiler, by pretending the > >> "other fortran compiler" does not exist. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > What happens to a project written with gnu C and vendor fortran? Will > > this test spot g++ and refuse to build the fortran files? > > Depends on if those fortran compilers have their own rules or if they > are inheriting.
> > Maybe we should look into tagging the archive_cmds instead. > > I did not see this mail til just now (after the commit). Want me to revert? I find this patch very very ugly. It's a confession that after a decade, we still can't get multi-lang right. I'm pretty sure that it will cause regressions for some people, too. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
