Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > On 6/7/15 9:45 AM, "Federico Bruni" <f...@inventati.org> wrote: > >>Thanks Oliver >> >>The correct email address is bug-lilypond@gnu.org >>The normal procedure is that the Bug Squad will open a new issue in the >>tracker if the errors are confirmed. >>I cannot comment on the changes proposed, sine I don't know anything >>about bagpipe music. I hope others will. > > I cannot comment on the changes either, but it seems like we have an > expert opinion that the changes are correct.
The main question we need to address then is whether there is reasonable suspicion that people relied on the previous behavior, possibly by figuring out the names of commands to use by looking at the charts. Are any users of bagpipe.ly known/reachable with whom we could discuss how to proceed for making this change? Are convert-ly rules advisable? Or is it more likely that existing music would actually get closer to the writer's actual musical intent? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
