On 22.07.2016 15:18, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
It should be written :{ <c' d' e'>4 }
Without the {}, actually. They form a sequential music expression, and that step comes only later.
and not: <<c4 d4 e4>>
I agree that it should be corrected. While it works (in an explicitly instantiated voice), I don’t think it’s good to showcase this syntax for writing a chord.
Examples that follow should also be corrected.
Only so much as to make it consistent: The steps would then be: 1) a single note 2) a chord 3) wrapping both sequentially 4) adding another music expression simultaneously. Best, Simon _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
