On Sat, 5 Aug 2017, John Darrington wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:09:17PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote: > I suggest that Paul's patch be sent to rms for approval/rejection. > > I think it's premature to do that.
Since the discussion has died down (nothing more in the past month), I think it clearly *is* now time to involve rms in the question of using changeset-level descriptions, not in ChangeLog format and written with the expectation that the reader has access to the VCS to look at the details of the change if desired. -- Joseph S. Myers [email protected]
