> I suggest that Paul's patch be sent to rms for approval/rejection. > > I think it's premature to do that.
Since the discussion has died down (nothing more in the past month), I think it clearly *is* now time to involve rms in the question of using changeset-level descriptions, not in ChangeLog format and written with the expectation that the reader has access to the VCS to look at the details of the change if desired. Go for it :-)
