Antonio Diaz Diaz <[email protected]> writes:

> I have noticed that chapter numbers in standards.info are out of sync
> because of an incorrect '@chapter' command:
>
> --- standards.texi~     2025-06-22 12:43:51.000000000 +0200
> +++ standards.texi      2025-06-28 19:24:33.000000000 +0200
> @@ -261,8 +261,9 @@
>  GNU packages.  Please write ``Windows'' in full, or abbreviate it to
>  ``w.''  @xref{System Portability}.
>
> +
>  @node Terms to Avoid
> -@chapter Terms to Avoid
> +@section Terms to Avoid
>
>  Be careful---never use the word ``steward'' to refer to any person
>  involved with developing any free software!  An EU directive, the CRA,
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Richard, can you please take a look at this? This section was introduced
recently by you in the following:

    revision 1.279
    date: 2025-06-22 10:43:51 +0000;  author: rms;  state: Exp;  lines: +48 
-39;  commitid: 1006857DE6540A509D5;
    Change "non-free" back to "nonfree".

Antonio's patch looks correct to me. It silences the texinfo warnings
atleast, but maybe you meant to make this a Chapter?

> While we are at it, there is an inconsistency between maintain.texi
> and standards.texi; they both contain an accented 'é', but
> maintain.texi encodes it directly in UTF-8, while standards.texi uses
> the (IMHO preferable) texinfo command "@'e":
> 
> --- maintain.texi~      2025-06-22 12:43:15.000000000 +0200
> +++ maintain.texi       2025-06-28 19:54:32.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2758,9 +2758,9 @@
>  humorous, so we do not defend every joke obtusely to the bitter end.
>  But @emph{the fact that it is a joke} is not a valid objection.
> 
> -There are people who frown on anything that is slightly risqué or
> +There are people who frown on anything that is slightly risqu@'e or
>  controversial, including jokes.  It would be a terrible shame for that
> -attitude to prevail, so our policy is that the occasional risqué joke
> +attitude to prevail, so our policy is that the occasional risqu@'e joke
>  is ok.  GNU is a 21st century project, not a 19th.
> 
>  @node Other Politics

This one looks fine too, but I am not sure it is needed with since the
file has "@documentencoding UTF-8".

Collin

Reply via email to