Lucian Silistru commented on a discussion on bsps/riscv/riscv/include/bsp/rnmi.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1391#note_158075 > + * > + * @ingroup RISCV_RNMI > + * > + * @brief RISC-V BSP specific RNMI definitions. > + */ > + > +#ifndef BSP_RNMI_H > +#define BSP_RNMI_H > + > +#ifdef __cplusplus > +extern "C" { > +#endif > + > +#define RNMI_PIN_ASSERTION (0x8000000000000000) > +#define RNMI_EXT_BUS_ERROR_STORE (0x8000000000000001) > +#define RNMI_EXT_BUS_ERROR_LOAD (0x8000000000000002) the initial idea was that anything that is rnmi specific stays somewhat separate; in our riscv there's a few more registers and masks defined here. so irq just gets shared code and the RNMI vectors. it's more for ease of rebase when moving forward with RTEMS. but no strong reason -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1391#note_158075 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/sent_notifications/5-6xstmda43u1xu3e1jvi848hoe-1d/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
