Kinsey Moore started a new discussion on testsuites/validation/tc-score-isr.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1452#note_158201 > - register uintptr_t sp __asm__( "1" ); > - > if ( interrupted_stack_at_multitasking_start == 0 ) { > - interrupted_stack_at_multitasking_start = sp; > + const Per_CPU_Control *cpu_self; > + const uintptr_t *frame; > + > + /* > + * The dispatch runs on the interrupt stack. The switch to that stack > + * stores the stack pointer of the interrupted context at the begin of > the > + * frame at the top of the interrupt stack. > + */ > + cpu_self = _Per_CPU_Get(); > + frame = (const uintptr_t *) ( (uintptr_t) > cpu_self->interrupt_stack_high - > + CPU_INTERRUPT_FRAME_SIZE ); > + interrupted_stack_at_multitasking_start = *frame; The previous code was trying to access r1, but the lowest address in the interrupt frame is marked r3. Is r3 actually the correct register to access instead of r1? -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1452#note_158201 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/sent_notifications/5-7vu7tmvp4j3xnpmkmzfcdzh35-1d/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
