----- Original Message ----- > On 21/08/2012 9:37 PM, Seán Coffey wrote: > > Looks fine to me but best to get an official jdk8 reviewer. > > Looks fine to me too. >
Thanks David. Is there a preferred tree for me to push this to? > > I presume the filter-out option on macosx becomes a no-op (on > > OpenJDK > > builds) some lines later : (Images.gmk) > > > > 264 JDK_MAN_PAGES := $(filter-out jvisualvm.1, $(JDK_MAN_PAGES)) > > Yes. > > > On the subject of dual Makefile maintenance, are there plans to > > eventually remove > > the older/legacy makefile structure on 8? I haven't been monitoring > > that > > topic too closely. > > Yes. At some point "real soon now" we should make the switch to using > the new build system for our official builds. Some of the work for 8 > is > only being done in the context of the new build system. > I need to look at moving our builds to using the new system. > David > ---- > > > regards, > > Sean. > > > > On 21/08/2012 12:13, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >> Ah good catch. I didn't realise this was duplicated in the new > >> build > >> system. > >> > >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jvisualvm/webrev.02/ > >> > >> should deal with both cases. > >> > >> If this is ok, is there a preferred forest to push to? I've been > >> testing against > >> build, but can easily push it somewhere else. > > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
