I haven't seen any complaints from build-dev members so I would also assume
that http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/ is a suitable repo.
I'll update bug status once I see your push.
regards,
Sean.
On 22/08/2012 10:29, David Holmes wrote:
On 22/08/2012 6:30 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
----- Original Message -----
On 21/08/2012 9:37 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Looks fine to me but best to get an official jdk8 reviewer.
Looks fine to me too.
Thanks David. Is there a preferred tree for me to push this to?
Not from me.
David
-----
I presume the filter-out option on macosx becomes a no-op (on
OpenJDK
builds) some lines later : (Images.gmk)
264 JDK_MAN_PAGES := $(filter-out jvisualvm.1, $(JDK_MAN_PAGES))
Yes.
On the subject of dual Makefile maintenance, are there plans to
eventually remove
the older/legacy makefile structure on 8? I haven't been monitoring
that
topic too closely.
Yes. At some point "real soon now" we should make the switch to using
the new build system for our official builds. Some of the work for 8
is
only being done in the context of the new build system.
I need to look at moving our builds to using the new system.
David
----
regards,
Sean.
On 21/08/2012 12:13, Andrew Hughes wrote:
Ah good catch. I didn't realise this was duplicated in the new
build
system.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jvisualvm/webrev.02/
should deal with both cases.
If this is ok, is there a preferred forest to push to? I've been
testing against
build, but can easily push it somewhere else.
