> From: Chris Hegarty <[email protected]>
> Subject: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images
> Date: 20 November 2014 21:39:14 GMT
> To: jigsaw-dev <[email protected]>, jdk9-dev
> <[email protected]>, build-dev <[email protected]>, Alan
> Bateman <[email protected]>, Alex Buckley <[email protected]>,
> Chris Hegarty <[email protected]>, Erik Joelsson
> <[email protected]>, Jonathan Gibbons <[email protected]>,
> Karen Kinnear <[email protected]>, "Jim Laskey (Oracle)"
> <[email protected]>, Magnus Ihse Bursie
> <[email protected]>, Mandy Chung <[email protected]>, Mark
> Reinhold <[email protected]>, Paul Sandoz <[email protected]>,
> "A. Sundararajan" <[email protected]>
>
> This is a review request for the changes for JEP 220: Modular Run-Time Images
> [1].
>
> There are a number of individuals responsible for these changes. Some,
> possibly not all, are explicitly listed in the 'To' section of this mail, and
> they will help address any comments arising from this review request.
>
> The new run-time image structure is defined in JEP 220 [1], and can be seen
> as a result of building the staging forest [2], or in the early access builds
> [3].
>
> Webrevs:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8061971/00/
>
> Due to the significant impact of these changes, a JDK 9 promotion has been
> tentatively reserved for their integration. All comments are welcome,
> although given the nature of the changes then we might have to create
> separate issues in JIRA to address some of them later in jdk9/dev.
>
> -Chris.
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220
> [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/m2/
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/ea
