On 21 Nov 2014, at 16:51, Sean Mullan <[email protected]> wrote:

> The JDK security related changes look fine to me. The 
> test/java/net/URLPermission/policy.* files only have copyright changes for 
> some reason.

Thanks for reviewing the security related changes Sean.

The jdk/test/java/net/URLPermission/policy.* files were changed in jigsaw/m2, 
at one point. Subsequent changes sync’ed from the JDK 9 mainline rendered these 
changes redundant, but the copyright, year range, change remained. The changes 
in these files are unnecessary and I have reversed them in jigsaw/m2 [1]

Thanks,
-Chris.

[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/m2/jdk/rev/3032b0232660


> --Sean
> 
> 
> On 11/20/2014 04:41 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Chris Hegarty <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images
>>> Date: 20 November 2014 21:39:14 GMT
>>> To: jigsaw-dev <[email protected]>, jdk9-dev 
>>> <[email protected]>, build-dev <[email protected]>, Alan 
>>> Bateman <[email protected]>, Alex Buckley <[email protected]>, 
>>> Chris Hegarty <[email protected]>, Erik Joelsson 
>>> <[email protected]>, Jonathan Gibbons <[email protected]>, 
>>> Karen Kinnear <[email protected]>, "Jim Laskey (Oracle)" 
>>> <[email protected]>, Magnus Ihse Bursie 
>>> <[email protected]>, Mandy Chung <[email protected]>, Mark 
>>> Reinhold <[email protected]>, Paul Sandoz <[email protected]>, 
>>> "A. Sundararajan" <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> This is a review request for the changes for JEP 220: Modular Run-Time 
>>> Images [1].
>>> 
>>> There are a number of individuals responsible for these changes. Some, 
>>> possibly not all, are explicitly listed in the 'To' section of this mail, 
>>> and they will help address any comments arising from this review request.
>>> 
>>> The new run-time image structure is defined in JEP 220 [1], and can be seen 
>>> as a result of building the staging forest [2], or in the early access 
>>> builds [3].
>>> 
>>> Webrevs:
>>>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8061971/00/
>>> 
>>> Due to the significant impact of these changes, a JDK 9 promotion has been 
>>> tentatively reserved for their integration. All comments are welcome, 
>>> although given the nature of the changes then we might have to create 
>>> separate issues in JIRA to address some of them later in jdk9/dev.
>>> 
>>> -Chris.
>>> 
>>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220
>>> [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/m2/
>>> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/ea
>> 

Reply via email to