----- Original Message ----- > > On 2015-02-23 19:57, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> I think the jdk changes with ppc64le as CPU make sense. > >> > >> Note that the changes to SoundDefs.h and SoundLibraries.gmk will be > >> obsolete with JDK-8072665 which is currently in the client forest. > >> > > Is it worth waiting on this to be promoted to jdk9 then? > Actually, I think the client people would prefer if a change to those > files went through the client forest, but if you rebase there, then > there is no change to client files. If it's alright with you, I would > recommend either waiting or perhaps just skip out on that change and > push early, as we expect it to go away in jdk9/dev in a week or so. >
Sure, I can reduce the changes in the jdk tree to just adding the jvm.cfg. Did we decide whether -DABI_ELFv2 was needed or not? If it isn't, then I'll drop this from the webrev too, and also from our version of the ppc64le port on OpenJDK 7. I take it jdk9/dev would be fine for that? Thanks, -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: ed25519/35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222 PGP Key: rsa4096/248BDC07 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
