On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:09:08 GMT, Robin Westberg <rwestb...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Yeah, bike-shedding aside, "Linux additional" is probably fine. So if we >> accept #1379, then it would also add "Windows additional"? > > Ah yeah, just saw that one. I guess just one additional column will still > make the table too wide.. Perhaps all the cross builds should just share a > single column. :) > > Going forward, I do think that the table should perhaps be removed though, > and the information should instead be moved down to the "checks" box (just as > GitHub actions show them natively - but perhaps condense them a bit just as > the current table). The constant updating of the table is probably the major > source of the "edit war" you have noticed can occur if you want to edit the > PR body yourself while any GitHub actions are still in progress. @rwestberg That sounds very good indeed! I did not think it was possible for Skara to access the Checks area, but if it does, it's really where this belong. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1350
