On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 21:38:52 GMT, Dean Long <dl...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Coleen Phillimore has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Remove wrong comment.
>
> src/hotspot/share/utilities/elfFile.cpp line 1723:
> 
>> 1721: void 
>> DwarfFile::LineNumberProgram::LineNumberProgramState::set_index_register(const
>>  uint64_t operation_advance,
>> 1722:                                                                        
>>        const LineNumberProgramHeader& header) {
>> 1723:   _op_index = (_op_index + operation_advance) % 
>> header._maximum_operations_per_instruction;
> 
> This should be narrowed by a byte.

So put the cast here?

> src/hotspot/share/utilities/elfFile.hpp line 790:
> 
>> 788:       // The address and op_index registers, taken together, form an 
>> operation pointer that can reference any
>> 789:       // individual operation with the instruction stream. This field 
>> was introduced with DWARF 4.
>> 790:       uint64_t _op_index;
> 
> This can be uint8_t, because it can never be larger than 
> _maximum_operations_per_instruction, which is also a byte.

This was windened as a result of a conversion warning, so I'd have to add a 
cast somewhere.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15233#discussion_r1296518068
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15233#discussion_r1296517769

Reply via email to