On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:59:50 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I'd like to separate the version update discussions from C++17 specifics, so > we can have focused discussions on the version choices. Of course, that's > going to be informed by the possibility of C++17, but that's not the only > factor. That way this issue can be just about turning on C++17, when, and why. > > In order to do that, I've filed the following issues about version updates: > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325881 Require minimum gcc version 10 > > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325878 Require minimum clang version 13 > > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325880 Require minimum OpenXL C/C++ > version 17.1.1 > > PRs will follow shortly. And here are the promised PRs: 8325881: Require minimum gcc version 10 https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/17899 8325878: Require minimum Clang version 13 https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/17862 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1 https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/17857 ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14988#issuecomment-1949900566
