build-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v17] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v19] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v19] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v19] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Integrated: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v11] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v11] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v11] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v7] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v8] SendaoYan
• RFR: 8300080: offset_of for GCC/Clang exhibits undefined behavior and is not always a compile-time constant Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8300080: offset_of for GCC/Clang exhibits undefined behavior and is not always a compile-time constant Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8300080: offset_of for GCC/Clang exhibits undefined behavior and is not always a compile-time constant Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8300080: offset_of for GCC/Clang exhibits undefined behavior and is not always a compile-time constant Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8300080: offset_of for GCC/Clang exhibits undefined behavior and is not always a compile-time constant Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8300080: offset_of for GCC/Clang exhibits undefined behavior and is not always a compile-time constant Johan Sjölen
  • Integrated: 8300080: offset_of for GCC/Clang exhibits undefined behavior and is not always a compile-time constant Kim Barrett
• RFR: 8363966: GHA: Switch cross-compiling sysroots to Debian trixie Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8363966: GHA: Switch cross-compiling sysroots to Debian trixie Fei Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8363966: GHA: Switch cross-compiling sysroots to Debian trixie Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8363966: GHA: Switch cross-compiling sysroots to Debian trixie Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8363966: GHA: Switch cross-compiling sysroots to Debian trixie Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8363966: GHA: Switch cross-compiling sysroots to Debian trixie Aleksey Shipilev
• RFR: 8366195: Remove unnecessary quotes around -Ta ml64 assembler argument Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8366195: Remove unnecessary quotes around -Ta ml64 assembler argument Erik Joelsson
  • Integrated: 8366195: Remove unnecessary quotes around -Ta ml64 assembler argument Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8366195: Remove unnecessary quotes around -Ta ml64 assembler argument duke
• RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build [v2] Claes Redestad
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build [v2] Paul Sandoz
  • Integrated: 8366455: Move VarHandles.GuardMethodGenerator to execute on build Chen Liang
• RFR: 8366399: Allow custom base reference for update_copyright_year.sh Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366399: Allow custom base reference for update_copyright_year.sh Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8366399: Allow custom base reference for update_copyright_year.sh Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8366399: Allow custom base reference for update_copyright_year.sh Chen Liang
• RFR: 8362516: Support of GCC static analyzer (-fanalyzer) Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8362516: Support of GCC static analyzer (-fanalyzer) Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8362516: Support of GCC static analyzer (-fanalyzer) Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8362516: Support of GCC static analyzer (-fanalyzer) [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8362516: Support of GCC static analyzer (-fanalyzer) [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8362516: Support of GCC static analyzer (-fanalyzer) [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8362516: Support of GCC static analyzer (-fanalyzer) Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues [v2] craigraw
  • Re: RFR: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues [v2] Sean Gilligan
  • Integrated: 8345810: Custom launchers must be linked with pthread to avoid dynamic linker issues Aleksey Shipilev
• RFR: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code Kim Barrett
  • Integrated: 8366121: Hotspot Style Guide should document conventions for lock-free code David Holmes
• RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 Roberto Castañeda Lozano
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v3] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v3] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v3] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v3] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v4] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v4] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v4] Ivan Walulya
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 [v4] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Integrated: 8314488: Compiling the JDK with C++17 Kim Barrett
• RFR: 8365815: JFR: Update metadata.xml with 'jfr query' examples Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8365815: JFR: Update metadata.xml with 'jfr query' examples [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8365815: JFR: Update metadata.xml with 'jfr query' examples [v3] Erik Gahlin
• RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Andrew Haley
  • Integrated: 8364184: [REDO] AArch64: [VectorAPI] sve vector math operations are not supported after JDK-8353217 Fei Gao
• RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken [v4] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Integrated: 8362243: Devkit creation for Fedora base OS is broken Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v2] Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v2] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v3] Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v2] Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v2] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v3] Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v4] Saint Wesonga
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v4] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v4] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v4] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v4] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v4] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v4] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 [v4] Saint Wesonga
  • Integrated: 8365579: ml64.exe is not the right assembler for Windows aarch64 Saint Wesonga
• RFR: 8365244: Some test control variables are undocumented in doc/testing.md Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365244: Some test control variables are undocumented in doc/testing.md Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8365244: Some test control variables are undocumented in doc/testing.md Volkan Yazici
  • Integrated: 8365244: Some test control variables are undocumented in doc/testing.md Volkan Yazici
• Fwd: DALEQ: An Open-Source Tool for Assessing Java Binary Equivalence Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees [v2] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8365048: idea.sh script does not correctly detect/handle git worktrees David Beaumont
• RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern [v2] Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern [v2] Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern [v2] Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern Fei Gao
  • Integrated: 8365312: GCC 12 cannot compile SVE on aarch64 with auto-var-init pattern Fei Gao
• RFR: 8365491: VSCode IDE: add basic configuration for the Oracle Java extension Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8365491: VSCode IDE: add basic configuration for the Oracle Java extension Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8365491: VSCode IDE: add basic configuration for the Oracle Java extension Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8365491: VSCode IDE: add basic configuration for the Oracle Java extension Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8365491: VSCode IDE: add basic configuration for the Oracle Java extension [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8365491: VSCode IDE: add basic configuration for the Oracle Java extension [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie

• Earlier messages
• Later messages