El 05/09/2014 18:42, "Ralf Friedl" <ralf.fri...@online.de> escribió: > > Xabier Oneca -- xOneca wrote: >> >> >> And I want to add that --help will only be used ever in an interactive >> >> >> shell by a person, so the return value may be dispensable. (i.e. >> >> doesn't mind to the user how does --help return as soon as the help >> >> text is printed in screen) >> > >> > Actually this is the argument to leave it as it is, because nobody cares about the return value of "false --help". >> >> What I was trying to say is that if a script appends --help to /bin/false because of a poorly sanitized user input, it should still return 1. And this change in behaviour wont not break any script nor user interaction with the applet. (Maybe even fixes some scripts!) >> > Do you have an example of any real word script that passes any arguments (user supplied or not) to /bin/false ?
Well... no. But I was thinking in a hypothetical script that takes a shell from /etc/passwd and a command from the user. Cheers, Xabier Oneca_,,_
_______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
