2015-03-13 10:18 GMT+01:00 Harald Becker <ra...@gmx.de>: > On 13.03.2015 09:04, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: >> >> Michael's proposal would allow you to do what you want to do, since >> you are one of those "experts who know how to build their own BB >> version". So what's wrong with his proposal? > > It is wrong, as his solution will either trow out users which stuck on the > kernel hotplug mechanism (or will not benefit from improvements), or block > spreading newer technology to the majority (who stuck on using pre-build > binaries).
There are many configuration options in BB that must be defined at build time. I don't see why this one would be different. Users that want a functional solution will not probably care much about the underlying implementation. Those who want to tailor BB to fit their preferences most likely don't have a problem with building their own BB. -- Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia guille.rodrig...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
