hi, the only news i'm aware of is that bv 1.1 started (see [1]) and matt prototyped some interesting stuff in the sandbox. i'm not aware of a decision on the last two big topics (logging and graduation).
regards, gerhard [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/ 2011/9/5 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > Hi Mark! > I would love to report - used to do it also for other incubation > projects - unfortunately having missed months of discussions I don't > think I could be useful :( > Looking forward to next BVAL evaluation - what about BVAL graduation > in the meanwhile? > Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Simo! > > > > Good call! We should deliver a board report this month. Who is > volunteering this month? > > > > I think there will be more activity in the next months since a new BVAL > JSR has formed. Afaik Gerhard Petracek is on the EG, so we will do some work > over here again. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: > >> Sent: Monday, September 5, 2011 5:55 PM > >> Subject: Re: Where to, Bean Validation? Follow-up > >> > >> Hi all guys, > >> I missed months of discussion about BVAL so sorry for re-joining so > >> late. Anyway, hope later is still better than never. > >> I didn't figure out, reading from archives on markmail, if BVAL got > >> graduation to TLP or not. > >> In any case, I renew my availability to help BVAL join the Commons > >> community, if interested... just let me know, have a nice day! > >> All the best, > >> Simo > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> http://www.99soft.org/ > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> I'd like to see the community coming to some sort of conclusion (and > >> acting on that conclusion :). > >>> > >>> I think the majority felt that a TLP was best. Some others felt a > Commons > >> sub-project would be best. I'm fine with either outcome. I'll note that > >> I do not plan on participating in the bval community post-graduation > (beyond > >> continuing in a mentor's role to insure a successful transition for the > >> project). > >>> > >>> Members of the community (volunteers?) will have to drive the > graduation > >> process. If we aren't willing to do this, well then maybe graduation is > not > >> an appropriate next step for Bean Validation... > >>> > >>> --kevan > >>> > >>> > >> > > >
