FWIW, I intend, soon, to merge my changes to the existing modules back into trunk, since the only dependency I added was commons-lang3, which has FINALLY been released after a wait of > 1 year. :P For my dynamic stuff things are slightly more complicated: - I am depending on the v2 branch of commons proxy, but only for test and optional provided library code. There is not technically a runtime requirement for it. - Over at Commons Simo has been graciously helping me to get [functor] positioned for graduation to a proper (now sandbox) component; [functor] will be a dependency of the finished [proxy] v2. - A decision should be made about the final destination of the dynamic stuff (I would be glad for it to live along with the other bval modules as in the sandbox repo [1]).
Given the first point above, one could theoretically make a case for an exception to the typically wise policy of "no snapshot dependencies." Given the second point, one could make a case for simply waiting as Simo seems to be an inexaustible source of energy and code at the ASF. :) Matt 1. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/bval/sandbox/lang3-work/ On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > > the only news i'm aware of is that bv 1.1 started (see [1]) and matt > prototyped some interesting stuff in the sandbox. > i'm not aware of a decision on the last two big topics (logging and > graduation). > > regards, > gerhard > > [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/ > > > > 2011/9/5 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > >> Hi Mark! >> I would love to report - used to do it also for other incubation >> projects - unfortunately having missed months of discussions I don't >> think I could be useful :( >> Looking forward to next BVAL evaluation - what about BVAL graduation >> in the meanwhile? >> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Simo! >> > >> > Good call! We should deliver a board report this month. Who is >> volunteering this month? >> > >> > I think there will be more activity in the next months since a new BVAL >> JSR has formed. Afaik Gerhard Petracek is on the EG, so we will do some work >> over here again. >> > >> > LieGrue, >> > strub >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Cc: >> >> Sent: Monday, September 5, 2011 5:55 PM >> >> Subject: Re: Where to, Bean Validation? Follow-up >> >> >> >> Hi all guys, >> >> I missed months of discussion about BVAL so sorry for re-joining so >> >> late. Anyway, hope later is still better than never. >> >> I didn't figure out, reading from archives on markmail, if BVAL got >> >> graduation to TLP or not. >> >> In any case, I renew my availability to help BVAL join the Commons >> >> community, if interested... just let me know, have a nice day! >> >> All the best, >> >> Simo >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> I'd like to see the community coming to some sort of conclusion (and >> >> acting on that conclusion :). >> >>> >> >>> I think the majority felt that a TLP was best. Some others felt a >> Commons >> >> sub-project would be best. I'm fine with either outcome. I'll note that >> >> I do not plan on participating in the bval community post-graduation >> (beyond >> >> continuing in a mentor's role to insure a successful transition for the >> >> project). >> >>> >> >>> Members of the community (volunteers?) will have to drive the >> graduation >> >> process. If we aren't willing to do this, well then maybe graduation is >> not >> >> an appropriate next step for Bean Validation... >> >>> >> >>> --kevan >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >
