thanks a lot Matt for your kind words! Let see if I'm able to maintain the promises I made... :P All the best!!! Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW, I intend, soon, to merge my changes to the existing modules back > into trunk, since the only dependency I added was commons-lang3, which > has FINALLY been released after a wait of > 1 year. :P For my > dynamic stuff things are slightly more complicated: > - I am depending on the v2 branch of commons proxy, but only for test > and optional provided library code. There is not technically a > runtime requirement for it. > - Over at Commons Simo has been graciously helping me to get > [functor] positioned for graduation to a proper (now sandbox) > component; [functor] will be a dependency of the finished [proxy] v2. > - A decision should be made about the final destination of the > dynamic stuff (I would be glad for it to live along with the other > bval modules as in the sandbox repo [1]). > > Given the first point above, one could theoretically make a case for > an exception to the typically wise policy of "no snapshot > dependencies." Given the second point, one could make a case for > simply waiting as Simo seems to be an inexaustible source of energy > and code at the ASF. :) > > Matt > > 1. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/bval/sandbox/lang3-work/ > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Gerhard Petracek > <[email protected]> wrote: >> hi, >> >> the only news i'm aware of is that bv 1.1 started (see [1]) and matt >> prototyped some interesting stuff in the sandbox. >> i'm not aware of a decision on the last two big topics (logging and >> graduation). >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/ >> >> >> >> 2011/9/5 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi Mark! >>> I would love to report - used to do it also for other incubation >>> projects - unfortunately having missed months of discussions I don't >>> think I could be useful :( >>> Looking forward to next BVAL evaluation - what about BVAL graduation >>> in the meanwhile? >>> Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi Simo! >>> > >>> > Good call! We should deliver a board report this month. Who is >>> volunteering this month? >>> > >>> > I think there will be more activity in the next months since a new BVAL >>> JSR has formed. Afaik Gerhard Petracek is on the EG, so we will do some work >>> over here again. >>> > >>> > LieGrue, >>> > strub >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>> >> From: Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >>> >> To: [email protected] >>> >> Cc: >>> >> Sent: Monday, September 5, 2011 5:55 PM >>> >> Subject: Re: Where to, Bean Validation? Follow-up >>> >> >>> >> Hi all guys, >>> >> I missed months of discussion about BVAL so sorry for re-joining so >>> >> late. Anyway, hope later is still better than never. >>> >> I didn't figure out, reading from archives on markmail, if BVAL got >>> >> graduation to TLP or not. >>> >> In any case, I renew my availability to help BVAL join the Commons >>> >> community, if interested... just let me know, have a nice day! >>> >> All the best, >>> >> Simo >>> >> >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> >> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to see the community coming to some sort of conclusion (and >>> >> acting on that conclusion :). >>> >>> >>> >>> I think the majority felt that a TLP was best. Some others felt a >>> Commons >>> >> sub-project would be best. I'm fine with either outcome. I'll note that >>> >> I do not plan on participating in the bval community post-graduation >>> (beyond >>> >> continuing in a mentor's role to insure a successful transition for the >>> >> project). >>> >>> >>> >>> Members of the community (volunteers?) will have to drive the >>> graduation >>> >> process. If we aren't willing to do this, well then maybe graduation is >>> not >>> >> an appropriate next step for Bean Validation... >>> >>> >>> >>> --kevan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >
