On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 03:12:16PM +0700, Fedor Indutny wrote: > Daniel, > > I had a strange de-ja-vu about it, and I was right. I already did one patch > like that in past. > > Anyway, I redid it - so including both old and new versions for your > reviewal. > > Thank you, > Fedor.
As a strange coincidence, I'm just writing a patch for SSSD that adds the possibility to also read the TTL for SRV records. I think this is a similar case. So could we, instead of adding a feature-specific name, add a new function with a less specific name (ares_parse_txt_ext() perhaps) that would return new structure, but the structure would also have some more data reserved for future use?
