Kindly reminding you about this. On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Fedor Indutny <fe...@indutny.com> wrote:
> Ping? ;) > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Fedor Indutny <fe...@indutny.com> wrote: > >> Ping ;) >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Fedor Indutny <fe...@indutny.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello guys! >>> >>> Long time again :) Sorry, I was busy with various other stuff. >>> >>> Here is a patch with (hopefully) all suggested changes. >>> >>> Please take a look! >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Fedor. >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote: >>>> > On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>You want me to add a couple of `void*`? >>>> > > >>>> > >I was thinking: >>>> > > uint8_t reserved[16]; >>>> > >>>> > Another way, which is one I've used elsewhere, is this: >>>> > >>>> > struct larger_in_future { >>>> > int age; /* generation of struct */ >>>> > void *member; /* always present */ >>>> > } >>>> > >>>> > And c-ares would always set age to 0 in the first generation. A future >>>> > extension of the struct would bump the age to 1 and extend the struct: >>>> > >>>> > struct larger_in_future { >>>> > int age; /* generation of struct */ >>>> > void *member; /* always present */ >>>> > >>>> > /* only present if 'age' is >= 1 */ >>>> > void *later; >>>> > } >>>> > >>>> > It means a program has to check age before accessing struct fields >>>> below >>>> > 'member' which is a bit of an annoyance, but possibly doable as the >>>> bumping >>>> > shouldn't happen terrible often? >>>> >>>> I don't have a problem with that personally. It's a neat trick I haven't >>>> used before. >>>> >>> >>> >> >