On Mon 2009-04-13 07:17:13 UTC-0700, Thomas Hruska ([email protected]) wrote:
> Which would have provided for interesting discussion about why 'argc' > exists in the first place since 'argv' is "generally sufficient" (i.e. > the array is NULL terminated on every platform I've ever used). My guess is that in the bad old pre-standard days (K&R C or prior?) the array wasn't NULL-terminated.
