>Java imitates C++, C++ should imitate Java :-) no thanks, I don't want the brain damage. I also don't want to dig around for an engine that takes me 30 minutes to find on their website so that I can inform the user about who sun is. "Hqave you heard of sun? We'll tell you about sun. Are you sure you haven't heard about them, we'd be more than happy to tell you." I'm kinda under the impression that programming languages are like people used to think of children a few decades ago. "don't speak until your spoken to, don't make yourself be noticed." Java doesn't do that.
Thanks, Tyler Littlefield Web: tysdomain.com email: [email protected] My programs don't have bugs, they're called randomly added features. ----- Original Message ----- From: John Gaughan To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [c-prog] clear my doubt Thomas Hruska wrote: > Wasn't thinking along those lines when I let it through. I was thinking > some weird mangled sentence involving the archaic 'int argc'. Which > would have provided for interesting discussion about why 'argc' exists > in the first place since 'argv' is "generally sufficient" (i.e. the > array is NULL terminated on every platform I've ever used). > Or better yet, why we do not have the following for C++: int main(std::vector<std::string> args) {...} Java imitates C++, C++ should imitate Java :-) -- John Gaughan http://www.jtgprogramming.org/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
