On 4/3/2010 2:53 AM, John Gaughan wrote:
> On 4/2/2010 1:02 PM, Knowledge Seeker wrote:
>    
>> Crux of the discussion ....Thread is needed where one thinks that a
>> aysnc-operation is needed .
>> In stone-age one used 'interrupts' for this. Right ?. These days one
>> uses a 'watcher-thread' .......
>>
>>      
> Stone age indeed. Interrupts are still used heavily, but high level
> languages abstract all that stuff away. You can create threads that
> monitor queues, where locking and synchronization is built in. You just
> call one or two methods and you have your data.
>
> Interrupts, mutexes, etc. are all taken care of. Why worry about them?
>
>    
I am going more simpler, why worry about multithreading itself.
lol

Reply via email to