On 4/3/2010 2:53 AM, John Gaughan wrote: > On 4/2/2010 1:02 PM, Knowledge Seeker wrote: > >> Crux of the discussion ....Thread is needed where one thinks that a >> aysnc-operation is needed . >> In stone-age one used 'interrupts' for this. Right ?. These days one >> uses a 'watcher-thread' ....... >> >> > Stone age indeed. Interrupts are still used heavily, but high level > languages abstract all that stuff away. You can create threads that > monitor queues, where locking and synchronization is built in. You just > call one or two methods and you have your data. > > Interrupts, mutexes, etc. are all taken care of. Why worry about them? > > I am going more simpler, why worry about multithreading itself. lol
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Knowledge Seeker
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Paul Herring
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Knowledge Seeker
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Tyler Littlefield
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Knowledge Seeker
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Tyler Littlefield
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Knowledge Seeker
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Tyler Littlefield
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Knowledge Seeker
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... John Gaughan
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Knowledge Seeker
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Tyler Littlefield
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Knowledge Seeker
- Re: [c-prog] MultiThreading !?... Tyler Littlefield
- Re: [c-prog] Is NULL defined somewhere? Benjamin Scott
- Re: [c-prog] Is NULL defined somewhere? Steve Searle
- Re: [c-prog] Is NULL defined somewhere? Benjamin Scott
- Re: [c-prog] Is NULL defined somewhere? Tyler Littlefield
- Re: [c-prog] Is NULL defined somewhere? Benjamin Scott
- Re: [c-prog] Is NULL defined somew... Tyler Littlefield
- Re: [c-prog] Is NULL defined s... Benjamin Scott
