Because there are some times when it is needed. Is this topic to ask about when
it could be used? Or to persuade people not to use it.
Thanks,
Tyler Littlefield
http://tds-solutions.net
Twitter: sorressean
On Apr 2, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Knowledge Seeker wrote:
> On 4/3/2010 2:53 AM, John Gaughan wrote:
> > On 4/2/2010 1:02 PM, Knowledge Seeker wrote:
> >
> >> Crux of the discussion ....Thread is needed where one thinks that a
> >> aysnc-operation is needed .
> >> In stone-age one used 'interrupts' for this. Right ?. These days one
> >> uses a 'watcher-thread' .......
> >>
> >>
> > Stone age indeed. Interrupts are still used heavily, but high level
> > languages abstract all that stuff away. You can create threads that
> > monitor queues, where locking and synchronization is built in. You just
> > call one or two methods and you have your data.
> >
> > Interrupts, mutexes, etc. are all taken care of. Why worry about them?
> >
> >
> I am going more simpler, why worry about multithreading itself.
> lol
>
>
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a blank message to
<mailto:c-prog-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com>.Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/c-prog/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/c-prog/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
c-prog-dig...@yahoogroups.com
c-prog-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
c-prog-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
