Just to say thx Vincent for the advice about the generic container.

It works ! After a day configuring, .. but the kick makes it all worth wile :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 January 2004 11:43
To: 'Cactus Users List'
Subject: RE: cactus ant task on existing container ?




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Quinten Verheyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 January 2004 09:23
> To: Cactus Users List
> Subject: RE: cactus ant task on existing container ?
> 
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> thank you for your very quick reply.
> 
> Concerning the why and how : if a (tomcat) container is started with
lots
> of jar's (libraries ;-) ), property file configs, environment
variables
> etc. and runs about x different webapps, of wich most use common jars
(in
> this case given with the classpath env var when creating tomcat
service),
> I feel reluctant to put the same jar's in a new testing webapp lib
dir,
> reconfiguring properties, env vars, etc.
> Of course, I guess it should pose no problems, but I would like to
"reuse"
> things instead, instead of recreating/assigning them. What better way
to
> do it (in that case anyway) then just deploy the cactified war in that
> container (like I did with the browser method) ?
> Or am I totally on the wrong thinking path here .. (wich is very
possible
> considering my newbee score on the subject :D).

I think the only thing not reused is the content of the tomcat conf/
directory. All the rest is reused (libraries, etc).

> 
> Anyway, I'll put your advise about the <generic> container into
practice
> right away !
> 
> Thx :-)

-Vincent

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 January 2004 17:56
> To: 'Cactus Users List'
> Subject: RE: cactus ant task on existing container ?
> 
> 
> Hi Quinten,
> 
> The <cactus> task automates the creation of a new container (as you
> rightly said). Some nested <container> elements support passing custom
> config file (the <jboss3x> one even supports passing a custom
container
> config).
> 
> The <tomcat?x> containers only support passing a custom server.xml
file
> (through the use of the serverxml attribute). However it does not
> support specifying a full existing tomcat configuration). Actually we
> have not had the need yet... Passing server.xml has been enough for
all
> cactus users need so far.
> 
> You mention other libraries. You mean jars right? These will be reused
> just fine. I don't see the problem. Are you modifying something else?
> 
> OTOH if you wish to use your complete own tomcat config, you'll need
to
> use the <generic> container (see
> http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/integration/ant/task_cactus.html).
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Quinten Verheyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 13 January 2004 17:45
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: cactus ant task on existing container ?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm confused about using the cactus ant task with an existing
> container
> > configuration.
> >
> > A tomcat container is running on my machine with a different webapps
> dir
> > instead of the standard webapps dir in the tomcat root.
> >
> > When running test cases I started first with building a cactified
war
> that
> > would then be deployed on the webapps dir of that container. Then my
> test
> > cases were run via the browser method, everything worked fine.
> >
> > When I want to automate the process via the ant task, I am puzzled
..
> >
> > The way I understand it, using the <cactus> task installs a new
Tomcat
> > container with possibly minimum config to a temp dir.
> >
> > But, .. I need to run the tests on the existing tomcat container,
not
> on a
> > new one ! It is running several other libraries that have nothing to
> do
> > with my test cases, but they are used by the classes that are
tested.
> > Objects that are in memory, etc.
> >
> > So, is there a way to automatically run cactus unit tests on an
> existing
> > container (like I did with the non-automatic browser method) ?
> >
> > Thx in advance..
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to