Jan, I know that you asked Jean and Alok to review ... :-)
I noticed that in the below code points to the boot_archive_archive file and saw that the name for the 64-bit and 32-bit files was inconsistent. One ends in '.py' while the other does not. Other then it always being this way is there another reason? Should this be fixed? Thanks, John > <script > name="/usr/share/distro_const/boot_archive_archive.py"> > <checkpoint > name="ba-arch" > ! message="Boot archive > archiving (64-bit)"/> > ! <argslist>"amd64"</argslist> > ! </script> > ! <script > name="/usr/share/distro_const/boot_archive_archive_32"> > ! <checkpoint > ! name="ba-arch-32" > ! message="Boot archive > archiving (32-bit)"/> > ! <argslist>"x86"</argslist> > </script> Jan Damborsky wrote: > Hi Jean, Alok, > > could I please ask you to review fix for following bugs ? > > <http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=7966>7966 setting > 'livemode=text' is no-op for AI, should be removed from installadm(1M) > 8140 Fix for 6440 applied to x86 AI images would reduce x86 AI memory > consumption > > > Thank you very much, > Jan > > webrev: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dambi/bug-8140/ > > testing done: > please see attachment for tests carried out and results > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
