Hey Sanjay, * sanjay nadkarni (Sanjay.Nadkarni at Sun.COM) wrote: > Looks like you found a bug. I am not sure why we did not see this. > On my system running snv126 I see > > gzcat /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive > > gzcat: /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive: not in gzip format > > $ pfexec lofiadm -a /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive /dev/lofi/1 > $file /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive > /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive: ISO 9660 filesystem image > > $ pfexec fstyp /dev/lofi/1 > hsfs > > Can you check if this is the same for you. > > If so, the boot_archive is no longer a compressed ufs file system. > Its an hsfs file system. > > The command that generated the boot_archive can generate either an > hsfs file system or a compressed ufs file system. The transfer > module needs to be made smarter.
Is there a bug on this? I'm seeing the exact same failure in my VMC bits (thought I'd screwed something up). Glenn
