* sanjay nadkarni (Sanjay.Nadkarni at Sun.COM) wrote: > Glenn Lagasse wrote: > >Hey Sanjay, > > > >* sanjay nadkarni (Sanjay.Nadkarni at Sun.COM) wrote: > >>Looks like you found a bug. I am not sure why we did not see this. > >>On my system running snv126 I see > >> > >>gzcat /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive > >> > >>gzcat: /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive: not in gzip format > >> > >>$ pfexec lofiadm -a /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive /dev/lofi/1 > >>$file /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive > >>/platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive: ISO 9660 filesystem image > >> > >>$ pfexec fstyp /dev/lofi/1 > >>hsfs > >> > >>Can you check if this is the same for you. > >> > >>If so, the boot_archive is no longer a compressed ufs file system. > >>Its an hsfs file system. > >> > >>The command that generated the boot_archive can generate either an > >>hsfs file system or a compressed ufs file system. The transfer > >>module needs to be made smarter. > > > >Is there a bug on this? I'm seeing the exact same failure in my VMC > >bits (thought I'd screwed something up). > > > >Glenn > > Not that I am aware of. Please file one.
Filed 12721. http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12721 Glenn
