Glenn Lagasse wrote: > Hey Sanjay, > > * sanjay nadkarni (Sanjay.Nadkarni at Sun.COM) wrote: > >> Looks like you found a bug. I am not sure why we did not see this. >> On my system running snv126 I see >> >> gzcat /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive >> >> gzcat: /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive: not in gzip format >> >> $ pfexec lofiadm -a /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive /dev/lofi/1 >> $file /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive >> /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive: ISO 9660 filesystem image >> >> $ pfexec fstyp /dev/lofi/1 >> hsfs >> >> Can you check if this is the same for you. >> >> If so, the boot_archive is no longer a compressed ufs file system. >> Its an hsfs file system. >> >> The command that generated the boot_archive can generate either an >> hsfs file system or a compressed ufs file system. The transfer >> module needs to be made smarter. >> > > Is there a bug on this? I'm seeing the exact same failure in my VMC > bits (thought I'd screwed something up). > > Glenn
Not that I am aware of. Please file one. -Sanjay
