Yes, I can make that change. I'm just not familiar with the 
manifestreader function, so I didn't realize that key-value pairs would
also fall into a ManifestReader section. Can I name this new section 
"Using ManifestReader", or is there
a more descriptive title?


Barbara


On 11/11/08 11:37, Jack Schwartz wrote:
> Hi Barbara.
>
> Response inline.
>
> On 11/10/08 17:04, Barbara.Lundquist at Sun.COM wrote:
>> Jack, I've made these edits in my master copies. Please see my added 
>> comments below. There's
>> a few responses worth noting.
> <snip>
>>
>>
>>> Note: it may be clearer to the reader to put how to use ManifestRead in 
>>> a different section, and refer to that section from here.  Then you can 
>>> just state that the first arg is just the server socket file name and it 
>>> is used with the ManifestReader, and see section xxx on how to use the 
>>> ManifestReader.
>>>
>>> If you do this, you can put the key/value pair section (starts on page 
>>> 14) there with it.
>>>   
>> I'm unclear on this piece, so will leave as is for now
> This comment pertained to the table on page 13.  I was suggesting to 
> reduce the "Server socket file name" description to something like this:
>
>     The first argument is the manifest reader socket. This argument 
> specifies the
>     socket that is used with /usr/bin/ManifestRead for accessing the 
> manifest data.
>     Please see section xxx on how to use the ManifestReader.
>
> and then have a different section dedicated to the ManifestReader 
> which takes the rest of the text (the remainder of the "Server socket 
> file name" description in table 2.2) plus the stuff in the key/value 
> pair section.
>
> Does this make more sense?
>
>     Thanks,
>     Jack
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/caiman-discuss/attachments/20081111/bc3380d4/attachment.html>

Reply via email to