Clay, Regarding comment #1 in the defect, why wouldn't this apply to beadm? It's coded toward 2.4 just like our other apps in the gate, so if/when the system's /usr/bin/python no longer points to 2.4 as the default, is beadm potentially broken?
Don't these changes address 8841 as well? Are they dups? thanks, -ethan Clay Baenziger wrote: > Hi all, > For bug 9804 (Need to ensure all python #! paths in install code have > version number) it seems that to test this change doing a DC build and > AI install should test many of the files touched. Doing this test was > successful. > I believe this change to be a completely functionally identical change > (i.e. /usr/bin/python is a symlink right now to /usr/bin/python2.4 > anyways). Could someone review that I changed only the #! Python lines > and that my testing method seems reasonable? > Thank you, > Clay > Webrev: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~clayb/9804/ > Bug: > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=9804 > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
