Hi Karen,
Thank you for the review and sanity check. My understanding for
the copyright was that unless the update is a material update I don't
update the copyright. Though I don't have a hard and fast knowledge of
material I was thinking this was pretty trivial[1].
Thank you,
Clay
[1]:
ON Policy is:
"When code containing a Sun copyright has been significantly modified, the
year on the Sun copyright is updated."
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Karen Tung wrote:
> Clay Baenziger wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> For bug 9804 (Need to ensure all python #! paths in install code have
>> version number) it seems that to test this change doing a DC build and AI
>> install should test many of the files touched. Doing this test was
>> successful.
>> I believe this change to be a completely functionally identical change
>> (i.e. /usr/bin/python is a symlink right now to /usr/bin/python2.4
>> anyways). Could someone review that I changed only the #! Python lines and
>> that my testing method seems reasonable?
>> Thank you,
>> Clay
>> Webrev:
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~clayb/9804/
>> Bug:
>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=9804
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> Hi Clay,
>
> For all the files you touched, if the copyright year on it is not 2009,
> please update them. All changes look good to me.
> Your testing method seems reasonable to me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Karen
>
>
