Hi Ethan,
This does apply to beadm but beadm doesn't introduce any special
differences in support. What works for the rest of Caiman should work for
BE code. Further, as the webrev shows some BE code was updated in this
work.
Unfortunately, these changes don't address 8841 as this does nothing for
our code being 2.5, 2.6 or 3 compatible.
Thank you,
Clay
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Ethan Quach wrote:
> Clay,
>
> Regarding comment #1 in the defect, why wouldn't this
> apply to beadm? It's coded toward 2.4 just like our other
> apps in the gate, so if/when the system's /usr/bin/python
> no longer points to 2.4 as the default, is beadm potentially
> broken?
>
> Don't these changes address 8841 as well? Are they dups?
>
>
> thanks,
> -ethan
>
>
> Clay Baenziger wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> For bug 9804 (Need to ensure all python #! paths in install code have
>> version number) it seems that to test this change doing a DC build and AI
>> install should test many of the files touched. Doing this test was
>> successful.
>> I believe this change to be a completely functionally identical change
>> (i.e. /usr/bin/python is a symlink right now to /usr/bin/python2.4
>> anyways). Could someone review that I changed only the #! Python lines and
>> that my testing method seems reasonable?
>> Thank you,
>> Clay
>> Webrev:
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~clayb/9804/
>> Bug:
>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=9804
>> _______________________________________________
>> caiman-discuss mailing list
>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>
