On 04/30/09 09:48, Ethan Quach wrote: > > > Susan Sohn wrote: >> Hi Ethan, >> >> It looks ok, but I'd suggest the following wording change: >> >> Due to dependency issues, SUNWcsd and SUNWcs >> must be listed first in the package list, >> after entire, and SUNWcsd must precede SUNWcs >> >> -> >> >> Due to dependency issues, entire must be listed first >> in the package list, followed by SUNWcsd, and then SUNWcs. > > Sounds fine to me. I'll accept. > In addition, I'll add a follow on line to clarify: > > Due to dependency issues, entire must be listed first in > the package list, followed by SUNWcsd, and then SUNWcs. > Any additional packages must be listed after SUNWcs.
Thanks for that extra line. Sue > (Alok, does that sound okay to you?) > > > thanks, > -ethan > >> >> Sue >> >> On 04/30/09 09:15, Ethan Quach wrote: >>> Need reviewers for this fix .... >>> >>> Webrev: >>> ------------ >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~equach/webrev.8541 >>> >>> >>> Defect: >>> ----------- >>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=8541 >>> >>> >>> Tested new manifest by using it as a base for customizations, and >>> adding it to an install service. Installed a client with it, >>> verifying that >>> client did use that manifest. >>> >>> >>> thanks, >>> -ethan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> caiman-discuss mailing list >>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >>
